<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W3C Launches New HTML Working Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.khankennels.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/03/11/w3c-launches-new-html-working-group/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.khankennels.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/03/11/w3c-launches-new-html-working-group/</link>
	<description>Lig&#039;s accidentally overheard ramblings on MySQL/PHP and life in general</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:51:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kid</title>
		<link>http://www.khankennels.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/03/11/w3c-launches-new-html-working-group/comment-page-1/#comment-45983</link>
		<dc:creator>kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.khankennels.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/03/11/w3c-launches-new-html-working-group/#comment-45983</guid>
		<description>two things mom. i does sort of sound like something you would do so w/e. and second &lt;strong&gt;Edit:&lt;/strong&gt; Child yelling at mom for not following her own advice.  taken out to save myself the embarrassment.  Nothing like a teenager to shove things back in your face and dress you down in public. 

*STALKES AWAY*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>two things mom. i does sort of sound like something you would do so w/e. and second <strong>Edit:</strong> Child yelling at mom for not following her own advice.  taken out to save myself the embarrassment.  Nothing like a teenager to shove things back in your face and dress you down in public. </p>
<p>*STALKES AWAY*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHPDeveloper.org</title>
		<link>http://www.khankennels.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/03/11/w3c-launches-new-html-working-group/comment-page-1/#comment-45896</link>
		<dc:creator>PHPDeveloper.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.khankennels.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/03/11/w3c-launches-new-html-working-group/#comment-45896</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ligaya Turmelle&#039;s Blog: W3C Launches New HTML Working Group...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ligaya Turmelle&#8217;s Blog: W3C Launches New HTML Working Group&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SantosJ</title>
		<link>http://www.khankennels.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/03/11/w3c-launches-new-html-working-group/comment-page-1/#comment-45851</link>
		<dc:creator>SantosJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.khankennels.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/03/11/w3c-launches-new-html-working-group/#comment-45851</guid>
		<description>Well, that makes the assumption, I think, that PHP cares about HTML and the chartered group cares about PHP or any one language for that matter (besides of course the markup language it is tasked to update). What would the working group benefit from having a PHP expert that another from either a vendor, developer, or content designer would not? 

I&#039;m curious as to what you would say, other than, &quot;Don&#039;t screw this up, you A-Holes!&quot; Of course, I would also think another word besides &#039;screw&#039; would be appropriate, which of course begins with a &#039;f&#039;.

PHP would benefit from the supported web services, but since it isn&#039;t XML, probably will be a hassle to parse. 

Server-side scripting mostly only cares about the POST. Building content easily would require support inside of the language. So not that we need to visit the group, but just implement their suggestions in the language when the time comes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that makes the assumption, I think, that PHP cares about HTML and the chartered group cares about PHP or any one language for that matter (besides of course the markup language it is tasked to update). What would the working group benefit from having a PHP expert that another from either a vendor, developer, or content designer would not? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious as to what you would say, other than, &#8220;Don&#8217;t screw this up, you A-Holes!&#8221; Of course, I would also think another word besides &#8216;screw&#8217; would be appropriate, which of course begins with a &#8216;f&#8217;.</p>
<p>PHP would benefit from the supported web services, but since it isn&#8217;t XML, probably will be a hassle to parse. </p>
<p>Server-side scripting mostly only cares about the POST. Building content easily would require support inside of the language. So not that we need to visit the group, but just implement their suggestions in the language when the time comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

